COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HYDRODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR- WATER SYSTEM USING DISSIMILAR MOTIONLESS MIXERS

Authors

  • Dr. Mazhar Hussain Department of Chemical Engineering, Sharif College of Engineering & Technology – Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33317/ssurj.228

Keywords:

Baffle type static element, Power Consumption, mass transfer coefficient, Pressure drop, depletion of air bubble size

Abstract

The hydrodynamic characteristics of mixing fluids are always the points to consider in improvement of their mixing quality especially using motionless mixers normally stated as “Static Mixers”. Motionless mixing technique was adopted for Air-Water system with the advantage of negligible power consumption over dynamic mixers. Different hydrodynamic characteristics were experimented using “Baffle Type” static element and were compared to those of already used in recent studies. Dissolved oxygen content, Static mixer geometry (i.e. Baffle, Blade, Wheel, Plate and Needle), mixing fluids flow rates were chosen as variables and selected in this content as rate of mass transfer study which founds out to be significant using “Baffle Type” static element. Volumetric mass transfer was also achieved at higher scale which gives a clear indication of increase the mass transfer coefficient in between the comparison of “Baffle type” element and other mentioned elements. Pressure droplet and depletion in Air bubble size across static elements were visually perceived using Hg-Manometer and still photography respectively. A mathematical model was also developed portraying the Air bubble diameter at different flow rates for this system. Other hydrodynamics like higher Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Content, Less Power consumption were also found to be more advantageous for “Baffle Type” static element.

References

Heyouni, A., Roustan, M., & Do-Quang, Z. (2002). Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in gas–liquid flow through static mixers. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(16), 3325-3333.

Munter, R. (2010). Comparison of mass transfer efficiency and energy consumption in static mixers. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 32(6), 399-407.

Couvert, A., Péculier, M. F., & Laplanche, A. (2002). Pressure drop and mass transfer study in static mixers with gas continuous phase. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 80(4), 727-733.

Legrand, J., Morançais, P., & Carnelle, G. (2001). Liquid-liquid dispersion in an SMX-Sulzer static mixer. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 79(8), 949-956.

Haario, H., & Turunen, I. (1991). The simulation of a co-current bubble reactor. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Mathematics in Industry (pp. 159-168). Springer, Dordrecht.

Paglianti, A. (2008). Recent innovations in turbulent mixing with static elements. Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering, 1(1), 80-87.

Hirschberg, S., Koubek, R., Moser, F., & Schöck, J. (2009). An improvement of the Sulzer SMX™ static mixer significantly reducing the pressure drop. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 87(4), 524-532.

Madhuranthakam, C. M. R., Pan, Q., & Rempel, G. L. (2009). Hydrodynamics in Sulzer SMX static mixer with air/water system. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(2), 719-726.

Hou, J., Qian, G., & Zhou, X. (2011). Gas–liquid mixing in a multi-scale micromixer with arborescence structure. Chemical Engineering Journal, 167(2-3), 475-482.

Theron, F., & Le Sauze, N. (2011). Comparison between three static mixers for emulsification in turbulent flow. International journal of multiphase flow, 37(5), 488-500.

Liu, J., Iranshahi, A., Lou, Y., & Lipscomb, G. (2013). Static mixing spacers for spiral wound modules. Journal of membrane science, 442, 140-148.

Diptendu D. (2015). Pressure drop and mass transfer study in static mixers with gas continuous phase. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 80(4), 727-733.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

Hussain, D. M. (2021). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HYDRODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR- WATER SYSTEM USING DISSIMILAR MOTIONLESS MIXERS. Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.33317/ssurj.228