Intra-Net Cognitive Radio Intelligent Utility Maximization using Adaptive PSO-Gradient Algorithm

Imran Ullah Khan

doi:10.33317/ssurj.186

Authors

Imran Ullah Khan Harbin Engineering University, Heilongjiang, Harbin, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33317/ssurj.186

Keywords:

Cognitive radio, Deep Learning, Reconfiguration, Power allocation, PSO, Gradient method, Network utility maximization, Base Station

Abstract

Artificial intelligence now days are mainly dependent on deep learning techniques as it is rapidly growing and capable to outperform other approaches and even human at various problems. Intelligently utilizing resources that meets the growing need of demanding services as well as user behavior is the future of wireless communication systems. Autonomous learning of wireless environment at run time by reconfiguring its operating mode that maximize its utility, cognitive radio (CR) can be programmed and configured dynamically and their utility maximization inside a building is a challenging task. Re-configurability and perception are the key features of cognitive radio while latest machine learning techniques like deep learning is used for system adaptation. In this paper an adaptive model to enhanced cognitive radio utilization to be maximized is proposed, that is, Particle swarm optimization (PSO) in combination with Gradient-method and intends to maximize the utility of CR. For this purpose the primary objective is allocation of optimum powers to base stations (BSs), which is achieved in an iterative manner keeping in view power constraints. A novel Distributed power PSOGradient Algorithm (DPPGA) is introduced, which assures utility maximization under network power constraints. The information regarding utility and interference of an individual BS is available to all of BSs, which is a key parameter, exploited in the proposed algorithm. Simulations are carried out by considering different scenarios and results are compared with existing algorithms. The performance of proposed algorithm is remarkable.

References

Zhou, X., Sun, M., Li, G. Y., & Juang, B. H. F. (2018). Intelligent wireless communications enabled by cognitive radio and machine learning. China Communications, 15(12), 16-48.

Awin, F. A., Alginahi, Y. M., Abdel-Raheem, E., & Tepe, K. (2019). Technical issues on cognitive radio-based Internet of Things systems: A survey. IEEE Access, 7, 97887-97908.

Arjoune, Y., & Kaabouch, N. (2019). A comprehensive survey on spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: Recent advances, new challenges, and future research directions. Sensors, 19(1), 126.

Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. IEEE personal communications, 6(4), 13-18.

Shah, S. B., Chen, Z., Yin, F., Khan, I. U., & Ahmad, N. (2018). Energy and interoperable aware routing for throughput optimization in clustered IoT-wireless sensor networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 81, 372-381.

Sajid, A., Hussain, K., Shah, S. B. H., Iqbal, T., & Baig, I. (2019). History and buffer rule based (forward chaining/data driven) intelligent system for storage level big data congestion handling in

smart opportunistic network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(7), 2895-2905.

The European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) : Electronic Communications Committee. (2014). ECC report 205, Licensed Shared Access (LSA).

Nekovee, M. (2010, April). A survey of cognitive radio access to TV white spaces. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting (IJDMBR) , pp.11, Article ID 236 568.

Phuong, T. M., & Kim, D. S. (2013). Robust distributed power control for cognitive radio based industrial wireless sensor networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. Sensors (Vol. 41, pp. 9-12).

Liu, Y., Tao, M., & Huang, J. (2012). An auction approach to distributed power allocation framework for multi-user cooperative networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(1), 237-247.

Ahmed, F., Tirkkonen, O., Dowhuszko, A. A., & Juntti, M. (2014, June). Distributed power allocation in cognitive radio networks under network power constraint. In 2014 9th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CROWNCOM) (pp. 492-497). IEEE.

Kang, X., Liang, Y. C., Garg, H. K., & Zhang, L. (2009). Sensing-based spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(8), 4649-4654.

Zhang, S., & Zhao, X. (2016). Power allocation for sensing-based spectrum sharing cognitive radio system with primary quantized side information. China Communications, 13(9), 33-43.

Orooji, M., Soltan Mohammadi, E., & Naraghi-Pour, M. (2014). Improving detection delay in cognitive radios using secondary-user receiver statistics. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(9), 4041-4055.

Noor, F., Sajid, A., Shah, S. B. H., Zaman, M., Gheisari, M., & Mariappan, V. (2019). Bayesian estimation and prediction for Burr‐Rayleigh mixture model using censored data. International Journal of Communication Systems, 32(15), e4094.

Shah, S. B. H., Chen, Z., Yin, F., & Ahmad, A. (2019). Water rippling shaped clustering strategy for efficient performance of software define wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 12(2), 371-380.

Sajid, A., & Hussain, K. (2018). Rule based (forward chaining/data driven) expert system for node level congestion handling in opportunistic network. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(3), 446-455.a

Shah, S. B., Zhe, C., Yin, F., Khan, I. U., Begum, S., Faheem, M., & Khan, F. A. (2018). 3D weighted centroid algorithm & RSSI ranging model strategy for node localization in WSN based on smart devices. Sustainable cities and society, 39, 298-308.

Kelly, F. (1997). Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European transactions on Telecommunications, 8(1), 33-37.

Luo, Z. Q., & Zhang, S. (2008). Dynamic spectrum management: Complexity and duality. IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing, 2(1), 57-73.

Palomar, D. P., & Chiang, M. (2007). Alternative distributed algorithms for network utility maximization: Framework and applications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(12), 2254-2269.

Kyosti, P. (2007). WINNER II channel models. IST, Tech. Rep. IST-4-027756 WINNER II D1. 1.2 V1. 2.