COMPARITATIVE ANALYIS OF IPVE & IPV6 INTENDED FOR LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORY TO SETUP AN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Imran Ullah Khan

doi:10.33317/ssurj.174

Authors

Imran Ullah Khan Harbin Engineering University, Heilongjiang, Harbin, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33317/ssurj.174

Keywords:

spot market, bilateral contracts, thermal unit commitment, mixed-integer linear programming

Abstract

In this modern era of Internet, E-learning is very popular among Internet users, users utilize Internet to learn from their homes with little or less effort. However the need to upgrade the suite to counter the ever increasing needs of internet was recognized and IPv6 suite was approved in 1994. IPv6 not only overcomes the issue of depletion of network addresses but also provides various other features such as automation, scalability, security, and others such as multicasting etc. Migration to IPv6 is dependent on its performance against the IPv4 implemented system. In this paper evaluation of various performance metrics of e-learning network performance on IPv4 vs IPv6 implemented system were considered. The results show the difference in the performance which must be considered when adopting the newer version and/or its implication on the end-system application. A comparison of performance of IPv6 on the Linux operating system against other popular operating system such as Windows and MacOS was noted. Overall it was shown by results that the Linux implementation of e-learning over IPv6 outperformed the other commodity operating system.

References

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368.

Shaikh, M. K., & Khan, M. A. (2011). 5 Performance Assessment of High Availability Clustered Computing using LVS-NAT. Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(1), 6-6.

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY.

Mayer, R. E. Moreno. R.(2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 38(1), 43-52.

Narayan, S., Shang, P., & Fan, N. (2009, April). Network performance evaluation of internet protocols ipv4 and ipv6 on operating systems. In 2009 IFIP International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Gotsis, K. A., Goudos, S. K., & Sahalos, J. N. (2005). A test lab for the performance analysis of TCP over ethernet LAN on windows operating system. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 318-328.

Zeadally, S., & Raicu, L. (2003). Evaluating IPv6 on Windows and Solaris. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(3), 51-57.

Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159.

Olubenjo, B., & Al-Debagy, U. (2014). A Comparative Review Of Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6). International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT)–volume, 13.

Li, F., Wang, X., Pan, T., & Yang, J. (2017). A Case Study of IPv6 Network Performance: Packet Delay, Loss, and Reordering. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017.

Mao, P., Xiao, Y., Hu, S., & Kim, K. (2010, October). Stable parameter settings for PI router mixing TCP and UDP traffic. In IEEE 10th International Conference On Signal Processing Proceedings (pp. 2547-2550). IEEE.

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. John Wiley & Sons.

AL-Dhief, F. T., Sabri, N., Latiff, N. A., Malik, N. N. N. A., Abbas, M., Albader, A., ... & Abd Ghani, O. I. O. (2018). Performance comparison between TCP and UDP protocols in different simulation scenarios. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.36), 172-176. Retrieved from www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET

E-learningNC, (2019). What is E-learning and its Methods. Retrieved from: http://www.E-Learningnc.gov/about_E Learning/methods_of_ELearning/&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiUjPGetennAhXl8eAKHdI8AHwQgwN6BAgJECc&biw=1920&bih=969

Quintero, A., Sans, F., & Gamess, E. (2016). Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms. International Journal of Computer Network & Information Security, 8(2) pp. 1-14.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Journal of educational psychology, 91(2), 358-368.

Mohamed, S. S., Buhari, M. S., & Saleem, H. (2006). Performance comparison of packet transmission over IPv6 network on different platforms. IEEE Proceedings: Communications, 153(3), 425–433.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368.